Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kit McKinney's avatar

Those are very interesting and somewhat alarming statistics on 50/50 and IPV. The data clearly shows that, with the presumption of 50/50, IPV decreases significantly. For some reason this doesn't feel right. Perhaps its bias. I'm a woman, after all. I try to check my biases but they are undoubtedly there. To play devil's advocate, I ask this...when do women, then, get the presumption of safety? Or must mothers trade parenting time for that? I'm not saying 50/50 isn't best. Perhaps it is. I believe what's best is what the child is used to at home already. Who is the primary caretaker? Why not keep change during such a tumultuous time at a minimum? My ex and I were 50/50 for 5 years on paper. In reality, I kept the OFW schedule updated and accurate, I took off work when kiddo was sick, I did the doctor appointments and school functions, went shopping for back-to-school...you know, the typical things society expects of mothers, whether single or married. In my experience, 50/50 time did NOT equal 50/50 division of labor or responsibility. So I worked harder for my 50%...not unlike making 80 cents on the dollar, which I also find unfair and unequal. Question: what efforts are being taken to assure that presumption of 50/50 doesn't take advantage of women in this way? Especially given the systemically patriarchal family court landscape? Most judges and officers of the court have no training in domestic abuse or IPV. How should we expect them to be familiar with and aware of these assumed roles and help equalize them? They will need to. It's these millions of little details and tasks that can beat a single parent down at the end of the day, exhausting them of time, energy and resources far exceeding that offered by their co-parent. But refuse to do them in the attempt to force increased parenting responsibility on the co-parent and risk being labeled as "difficult" in family court...which risks everything. Absolutely everything. Which is why women will continue to be somewhat disadvantaged by the presumption of 50/50.

Expand full comment